Monday, March 21, 2011

I believe very strongly in organ donation.  I am an organ donor, I have convinced family members to become organ donors, and I have given a few persuasive speeches on organ donation (so hopefully I have also demonstrated the benefits of organ donation to my peers).  Typical organ donations occur once the donor has deceased; however the number of living donations that occur is increasing.  According to Donate Life America, living donors are able to donate their kidneys, a lobe of a lung, part of their liver, a piece of their pancreas, or a section of their intestine.

I believe strongly in organ donation but would I actually be able to undergo the knife to save a stranger’s life?  My immediate reaction is YES!  I am healthy, I can live a pretty normal life after the donation, so why not offer someone else a second chance at life.  It would be selfish not too, right? 

After recently reading an article titled, “The Kindest Cut” written by Larissa MacFarquhar all of my thoughts surrounding donation began to stir.  The article focused on a website, MatchingDonors.com.  MatchingDonors.com is a website that people waiting for organs can go on to post their story and see if anyone is willing to help them by donating an organ.  The article explored stories of people, often times complete strangers, who underwent a living donation.  The article also explored some of the criticisms living donors face.  You think people would be praised for donating their kidneys to strangers, but in reality, that is not always the case.  Sometimes living donors are looked down upon because other people view them as trying to play God- they are deciding who lives or dies.

What would Peter Singer say about all of this?  Well for a man who argues that peoples' surplus to essentials should be given up in an article titled, "The Singer Solution to World Poverty", I believe he would also argue that peoples' extra kidney should be donated to help decrease the number of kidney transplantation candidates on the donor list.  He argues that the money used to pay for a new car could save children's lives, so I believe he would also argue that the extra kidney in someone's body could and should be used to save others' lives. 

Now it comes down to do I agree and would I offer a kidney to someone else?  I'm contradicted.  I do agree with what I believe Singer would believe.  I do think not giving up a kidney is selfish, but that being said I do not know if I would actually be able to go through with the process.  I went on Matching Donors.com and I was overwhelmed.  Who would I pick?  What should I type in my search box?  Just because I live in Pennsylvania, should I eliminate the recipients in California?  If I did give up one of my kidneys, what should the criteria I look in the recipient be?  But most importantly, I thought of all of the lives I was not able to save.  Who am I to decide who lives and who dies?

2 comments:

  1. The God complex is an unfortunate conundrum when it comes to organ donation. However, no matter the decision, we're all playing God. We choose to not donate, we choose to let everyone die. We choose to donate and we can only help one person, but that's better than no people, right? The God complex is only an issue because so few people donate; if everyone chipped in a kidney, it wouldn't be so much about picking and choosing.

    Besides, it's not the donor's choice, entirely. Their kidney is not going to be a good match for everyone.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Going to matchingdonors.com was a great idea for getting an idea of what kind of decision this would be to make. While reading, I thought about why it would be personally difficult to go through surgery for a stranger, but I never thought about how hard it would be to pick just one person to donate to.

    ReplyDelete